Anarchism Reloaded - Kindle edition by Florin, Serban. Politics & Social Sciences Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.
Ontological anarchy, as conceptualized by figures like Hakim Bey in works such as "T.A.Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone," proposes a radical rethinking of political existence. Here’s a breakdown of the concept:
Key Concepts of Ontological Anarchy:
Ontology:
Traditionally, ontology deals with the nature of being, reality, or existence. In political terms, it would explore what it means to exist or act politically.
Anarchy:
Conventionally, anarchy refers to a society without government or law. In this context, it's about the absence of hierarchical structures in the very essence of being.
Redefinition of Political Being:
Autonomy: The core idea is to achieve true autonomy, where individuals or communities govern themselves completely free from external control or societal norms that are not self-imposed.
Temporary Autonomous Zones (T.A.Z.): Bey suggests creating spaces or moments where life is temporarily liberated from control and authority. These zones are not permanent; they exist in the gaps or cracks of the state's control.
Immediatism: This philosophy encourages living in the moment, rejecting the deferred gratification that comes with structured societal roles and political systems.
Art and Play: Political action is seen more as an artistic or playful act, where imagination and creativity define the political landscape rather than structured rules or laws.
Ontological Foundations: At its core, ontological anarchy questions the nature of being in a political context. It posits that every individual has an inherent right to define their own reality, their own way of being.
This is not merely about political freedom but existential autonomy. The ontology here transcends physical and social boundaries, suggesting that true political freedom begins with the freedom to define one's own existence.
The Role of Imagination: Imagination is key in ontological anarchy. Political action becomes an art form where the imagination shapes reality. This isn't just metaphorical; in the context of ontological anarchy, envisioning different ways of being can lead to the actualization of these visions in real spaces and times. This imaginative leap is what allows for the creation of Temporary Autonomous Zones (T.A.Z.).
T.A.Z. as a Political Tool: These zones are not merely physical locations but exist whenever and wherever control momentarily slips away from authoritative structures. They could be a squatted building, a festival, or an online community. The T.A.Z. embodies the philosophy by allowing for a microcosm of freedom where traditional political, economic, and social norms are suspended or inverted. Here, the politics of being is about creating moments of pure freedom, where spontaneous order emerges from chaos, driven by the desires and interactions of those present.
Immediatism: This aspect of ontological anarchy emphasizes living in the present, rejecting the future-oriented goals that dominate conventional political thinking. Instead of planning for a future utopia, immediatism advocates for finding and creating utopian moments now. This philosophy challenges the deferred satisfaction model of politics where actions today are justified by benefits promised for a future that might never come.
The Critique of Power Structures: Rather than seeking to dismantle or capture the state, ontological anarchists might simply ignore it where possible, finding freedom in the interstices of power. This isn't passive; it's a proactive disengagement from the traditional power dynamics, choosing instead to live beyond them. This approach can be seen as a critique of the very idea of political power, suggesting that true autonomy might not be achievable within the current frameworks of governance.
Practical Manifestations: In practice, this might look like flash mobs, impromptu art installations, or digital platforms where censorship and control are minimal, fostering an environment where new social contracts are formed momentarily.
These actions often celebrate the ephemeral, recognizing that permanence might be antithetical to the essence of freedom they seek.
Here are additional scholars and their contributions to or discussions around ontological anarchy, incorporating the broader context of philosophical and political thought:
Saul Newman - A political theorist known for his work on postanarchism, Newman has engaged with the idea of ontological anarchy through his critique of traditional political ideologies. His work often examines how power and resistance operate at an ontological level, challenging the foundational assumptions of political being.
Todd May - A philosopher who has written on poststructuralism and anarchism, May's work can be seen as intersecting with ontological anarchy by questioning the nature of identity, subjectivity, and political action. His engagement with thinkers like Foucault and Deleuze provides a philosophical backdrop for understanding ontological anarchy.
Eugene Holland - Drawing from Deleuze and Guattari, Holland's exploration of nomadology and the war machine in political contexts can be associated with the concept of ontological anarchy, particularly in how these ideas resist static, hierarchical structures in favor of dynamic, creative processes.
John Holloway - In his book "Change the World Without Taking Power," Holloway explores concepts of power and resistance that resonate with ontological anarchy. He argues for a transformation through the cracks of capitalism, which aligns with the idea of finding and creating spaces of freedom.
David Graeber - An anthropologist, activist, and anarchist, Graeber's work often touches on themes related to ontological anarchy, particularly through his advocacy for direct action and his critique of bureaucratic structures. His concept of "the art of not being governed" could be seen as a practical application of ontological anarchic principles.
George Katsiaficas - Known for his work on the "eros effect," Katsiaficas discusses spontaneous uprisings and movements that align with the temporary, festive, and revolutionary aspects of ontological anarchy. His focus is on how these moments of collective action temporarily break from established norms.
Simon Critchley - While not directly an anarchist scholar, Critchley's work on the ethics of resistance and his discussions on anarchism in "Infinitely Demanding" can be seen as engaging with the ontological underpinnings of political action, where individuals resist through ethical commitment rather than through structured political entities.
Jason Adams - An American political theorist whose work includes discussions on contemporary anarchism. His exploration of post-anarchism and its implications could intersect with ontological anarchy by questioning traditional anarchistic models in favor of more fluid, less defined modes of political existence.
Levi Bryant - A philosopher who has contributed to Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO), Bryant's work on ontology and politics could provide a framework for understanding ontological anarchy through a lens that privileges the reality of objects over human-centric interpretations of being.
Peter Sloterdijk - While known for his broader philosophical critiques, Sloterdijk's ideas on spheres of existence and his notion of "foams" where individual lives intersect in communal yet non-hierarchical ways, could be interpreted as having resonances with ontological anarchy's emphasis on temporary, autonomous spaces.
These scholars, while not all directly addressing "ontological anarchy" as a term, contribute to a discourse that questions the essence of political identity, the nature of being in a political context, and the possibilities for resistance and autonomy outside conventional political structures. Their works enrich the theoretical landscape surrounding ontological anarchy, offering insights into how we might understand or enact political freedom in a more existential, ontological manner.
Implications:
Decentralization: Political existence is not about taking over or reforming existing power structures but rather sidestepping them.
Fluidity: There's an emphasis on spontaneity over permanence, where political entities or actions might not aim for longevity but for intensity and impact.
Cultural Revolution: It often implies a cultural shift where traditional political ideologies are less relevant, and the focus is on the lived experience and personal freedom.
Critique of Conventional Politics: Ontological anarchy challenges the very notion of what politics is, suggesting it should be about existential freedom rather than power acquisition or governance.
Challenges and Criticisms:
Sustainability: The temporary nature of T.A.Z. might make it less effective in addressing long-term systemic issues like poverty, climate change, or social justice.
Elitism: There's a critique that such practices might be more accessible to those with the time and resources to engage in 'playful' political acts, potentially ignoring the broader socio-economic constraints.
Misinterpretation: The term "anarchy" can lead to misunderstanding, equating it with chaos or disorder rather than a philosophical approach to freedom.
Ontological anarchy thus invites a profound reevaluation of how we perceive and engage with political life, pushing towards a utopian vision where political action is an expression of one's existential freedom, rather than a quest for control or authority.
However, its practical application in broad societal contexts remains a subject of debate and experimentation.
Комментарии