The End of Russian Gas Transit via Ukraine: Implications for Europe’s Energy Future
- Prof.Serban Gabriel
- Dec 20, 2024
- 3 min read
Introduction
As the clock ticks down to January 1, 2025, the expiration of the Russian gas transit agreement through Ukraine is poised to reshape Europe's energy landscape significantly. This pivotal moment comes amidst ongoing tensions between Russia and Ukraine and a broader geopolitical struggle that has seen Europe striving to reduce its dependence on Russian energy.
The implications of this transition are profound, affecting energy security, pricing, and the future of European energy policy.
Current State of Russian Gas Transit
The existing transit agreement allows Russia to transport gas through Ukraine to several EU countries. Historically, this route has been vital for supplying gas to Central and Eastern Europe, accounting for approximately half of Russia's remaining pipeline gas exports to the EU and about one-third of total Russian gas exports, including liquefied natural gas (LNG)
. However, as of 2023, the share of Ukrainian transit in EU gas imports has diminished significantly, dropping from 11% in 2021 to around 5%
.In 2024, Russian gas deliveries via Ukraine totaled approximately 14.17 billion cubic meters (Bcm), a decrease from previous years but still crucial for countries like Austria, Hungary, and Slovakia, which relied on this route for about 65% of their gas demand
. As the expiration date approaches, concerns are mounting over how these nations will secure their energy supplies without this critical transit route.
Economic Impacts
The end of the transit deal is expected to have significant economic ramifications. For Russia, losing this agreement could result in an annual revenue loss of approximately $6.5 billion unless alternative routes or LNG terminals can be utilized effectively
. For Ukraine, the cessation of transit fees—currently contributing about 0.5% to its GDP—will further strain its economy already battered by war
.Countries such as Austria and Slovakia are particularly vulnerable; they will need to find alternative sources for an estimated additional import requirement of around 140 TWh annually from other suppliers once the contract ends
. This shift could lead to increased competition for LNG supplies globally, driving prices higher across Europe.
Future Scenarios
As Europe prepares for a post-transit landscape, several scenarios could unfold:
Increased LNG Imports: With the end of Russian gas flows via Ukraine, European nations may pivot towards LNG imports from alternative suppliers such as the United States and Qatar. This transition would require significant investments in LNG infrastructure and terminals across Europe. Countries like Poland and Germany have already begun enhancing their LNG capabilities in anticipation of reduced pipeline supplies
Diversification Strategies: The EU has set a non-binding goal to stop all Russian gas imports by 2027. The end of Ukrainian transit could accelerate this decoupling process. European leaders may explore partnerships with countries like Azerbaijan or seek increased production from renewable sources as part of a long-term strategy to ensure energy security
Market Volatility: The uncertainty surrounding future gas supplies could lead to increased volatility in European energy markets. As seen recently, market concerns regarding the future of Ukrainian transit have already driven up gas prices for early 2025 delivery contracts
. This volatility might prompt governments to implement price controls or subsidies to protect consumers from soaring energy costs.
Geopolitical Tensions: The expiration of the transit agreement may exacerbate geopolitical tensions between Russia and the EU. Moscow may attempt to leverage its remaining energy supplies as a tool for political influence over European nations while simultaneously seeking new markets in Asia
Conclusion
The impending end of Russian gas transit through Ukraine marks a critical juncture for Europe's energy future.
As Central European nations grapple with the implications of losing this vital supply route, they must navigate a complex landscape characterized by economic pressures and geopolitical challenges.
The transition away from Russian energy dependency will require concerted efforts from EU member states to diversify their energy sources and invest in new infrastructure.
While this shift presents challenges, it also offers an opportunity for Europe to redefine its energy strategy in pursuit of greater security and sustainability.As we move closer to January 2025, all eyes will be on how Europe adapts to these changes and what strategies it employs to ensure a stable energy supply amidst an evolving geopolitical landscape.

Comments