Abstract
This analysis examines the possibility of Vice President Kamala Harris winning Alaska in the 2024 presidential election, a state traditionally considered safely Republican.
Recent polling suggesting Harris within striking distance of former President Donald Trump in Alaska has sparked discussion about potential shifts in the state's political landscape.
This paper explores the historical, demographic, and political factors that could influence such an outcome, drawing parallels with recent Democratic successes in the state while acknowledging the significant challenges Harris faces.
Introduction
Alaska, with its mere three electoral votes, has long been considered a reliable Republican stronghold in presidential elections.
The state has voted for the Republican presidential candidate in every election since 1964, with the exception of 1964 when Lyndon B. Johnson won the state.
However, recent political developments, including the election of Mary Peltola to Congress and Lisa Murkowski's successful write-in campaign and subsequent reelection, suggest potential vulnerabilities in the Republican Party's grip on the Last Frontier.
Historical Context
Alaska's Presidential Voting History
Alaska has consistently supported Republican presidential candidates by significant margins. In 2020, Donald Trump won the state by approximately 10 percentage points over Joe Biden, a narrower margin than his 2016 victory but still substantial.
The state's unique political culture, characterized by a strong libertarian streak and skepticism of federal government intervention, has traditionally aligned more closely with Republican messaging.
Recent Political Shifts
The election of Democrat Mary Peltola to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2022 marked a significant shift in Alaska's political landscape.
Peltola's victory, aided by the state's ranked-choice voting system, demonstrated that under certain conditions, a Democrat could win statewide office in Alaska.
Additionally, Senator Lisa Murkowski's success as a moderate Republican who frequently breaks with party orthodoxy suggests an electorate that may be more nuanced than traditional red-state characterizations suggest.
Demographic Analysis
Changing Population Dynamics
Alaska's population, while still predominantly white, has become increasingly diverse over the past decades.
The state has a significant Alaska Native population (approximately 15%) and growing Asian and Hispanic communities.
These demographic changes could potentially benefit Democratic candidates, as these groups tend to vote Democratic at higher rates nationally.
Urban-Rural Divide
Like many states, Alaska exhibits a stark urban-rural political divide.
Anchorage and its suburbs, home to nearly half the state's population, have shown increasing openness to Democratic candidates.
However, rural areas remain strongly Republican, with some notable exceptions in Native communities.
Factors Potentially Favoring Harris
Ranked Choice Voting
Alaska's ranked-choice voting system, implemented in 2020, could potentially benefit Harris. If third-party candidates draw significant support, second-choice votes could prove crucial. Harris might be positioned to benefit from this system if she can present herself as a more palatable second choice to independents and moderate Republicans.
Environmental Concerns
Alaska is experiencing some of the most dramatic effects of climate change in the United States.
As these impacts become more apparent, voters may become more receptive to Democratic messaging on environmental issues.
Harris's support for climate action, while potentially alienating some voters, could resonate with others who see the direct effects of warming temperatures on their lives and livelihoods.
Economic Factors
Alaska's economy, heavily dependent on resource extraction, has faced challenges as oil prices fluctuate and concerns about the long-term viability of fossil fuel industries grow. Harris could potentially appeal to voters by presenting a vision for economic diversification while being careful not to alienate those whose livelihoods depend on the energy sector.
Significant Challenges
Gun Rights
Alaska has some of the most permissive gun laws in the country, and gun ownership is deeply ingrained in the state's culture. Harris's support for stricter gun control measures could be a significant liability in appealing to Alaska voters.
Federal Land Management
With over 60% of Alaska's land under federal management, many Alaskans are skeptical of federal oversight. Harris would need to carefully navigate this issue, potentially emphasizing local control and consultation while maintaining environmental protections.
Cultural Factors
As a former California Attorney General and current Vice President from the San Francisco Bay Area, Harris may face challenges in connecting with Alaska voters who often view "Lower 48" politicians, particularly from coastal states, with suspicion.
Comparative Analysis: Peltola's Success vs. Presidential Politics
Mary Peltola's victory provides a potential template for Democratic success in Alaska, but several factors make replicating her success at the presidential level challenging:
Local vs. National Focus: Peltola successfully emphasized Alaska-specific issues and her deep roots in the state, advantages Harris lacks.
Ranked Choice Dynamics: While the ranked-choice system helped Peltola, presidential elections typically see higher turnout and more polarized voting patterns.
Personal Appeal: Peltola's moderate positioning and emphasis on "fish, family, and freedom" resonated with Alaskan voters. Harris would need to find similarly effective ways to connect with the electorate.
Strategic Considerations for Harris
Potential Campaign Approaches
Economic Messaging: Focus on economic diversification while respecting the role of traditional industries.
Native Outreach: Emphasize support for tribal sovereignty and addressing issues important to Alaska Native communities.
Moderate Positioning: Potentially downplay certain national Democratic priorities while emphasizing areas of common ground.
Resource Allocation
Given Alaska's small electoral vote count, the Harris campaign would need to carefully weigh the resources required to compete in the state against potential gains in other battlegrounds. However, a strong showing in Alaska, even in a losing effort, could force the Trump campaign to expend resources defending traditionally safe territory.
The Trump Factor
Trump's relationship with Alaska is complex. While he maintains strong support among many voters, his conflicts with Senator Murkowski and some of his administration's policies regarding Alaska (such as support for Pebble Mine) have created tensions. Harris's campaign could potentially exploit these divisions, particularly among moderate Republicans and independents.
Polling Analysis and Methodological Considerations
Recent polling showing Harris within striking distance of Trump in Alaska must be viewed with several caveats:
Historical polling challenges in Alaska due to its geographic spread and low population density.
The difficulty of accurately sampling Alaska Native communities.
The state's transient population, with significant seasonal variations.
Conclusion
While a Harris victory in Alaska remains unlikely, the possibility cannot be entirely dismissed. The state's evolving political landscape, demographic changes, and recent Democratic successes suggest potential vulnerabilities in what was once considered an impregnable Republican fortress.
However, the challenges facing Harris in Alaska remain formidable, and any path to victory would require a near-perfect alignment of factors in her favor.
For Harris, the strategic value of competing in Alaska might extend beyond the state's three electoral votes.
Forcing Trump to defend traditionally safe territory could have broader implications for resource allocation in the national campaign.
Additionally, a stronger-than-expected showing in Alaska could signal broader shifts in the electoral map, particularly in other resource-dependent states with significant rural populations.
Ultimately, while the possibility of Harris winning Alaska should not be dismissed out of hand, it remains a long shot.
The more pertinent question may be whether the margin of victory in Alaska could narrow enough to signal broader changes in the American electoral landscape.
Comments