Abstract
This paper examines the complex relationship between coal mining, economic development, and environmental degradation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, focusing on the period from the 1990s to the present day.
The study is framed around the poignant phrase "More necessary than the sun," uttered by a Bosnian coal worker in the 1990s, which encapsulates the tension between economic necessity and environmental concerns.
Through an analysis of historical data, economic indicators, health statistics, and environmental assessments, this research illuminates the multifaceted impacts of the coal industry on Bosnian society.
The paper also explores potential future scenarios for Bosnia's energy sector, considering both the economic implications of moving away from coal and the environmental imperatives driving such a transition.
1. Introduction
The history of Bosnia and Herzegovina is inextricably linked to its coal industry. For decades, coal has been a cornerstone of the country's economy, providing employment, energy security, and a foundation for industrial development.
However, this reliance on coal has come at a significant cost to public health and the environment.
The phrase "More necessary than the sun," attributed to a Bosnian coal worker in the 1990s, powerfully encapsulates the complex relationship between the country and its coal resources.
This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the role of coal in Bosnia's economic development, its impact on public health and the environment, and the challenges facing the country as it grapples with the need to transition to cleaner energy sources.
By examining historical data, current trends, and future projections, we seek to understand the full scope of coal's influence on Bosnian society and explore potential pathways for a sustainable future.
2. Historical Context
2.1 The Rise of Coal in Bosnia
Coal mining in Bosnia and Herzegovina dates back to the mid-19th century, with the first organized coal extraction beginning in 1865 in the town of Kreka (Lukić et al., 2016).
The industry expanded rapidly during the Austro-Hungarian period (1878-1918), laying the foundation for the region's industrialization.
During the Yugoslav era (1945-1992), coal mining became a central pillar of Bosnia's economy.
The socialist government invested heavily in the industry, viewing it as key to economic development and energy independence.
By the 1980s, Bosnia was producing over 15 million tons of coal annually, primarily lignite and brown coal (Federal Institute of Statistics, 1991).
2.2 Coal in the Post-War Period
The Bosnian War (1992-1995) severely disrupted coal production and damaged much of the mining infrastructure. In the immediate post-war years, reviving the coal industry was seen as crucial for economic recovery and energy security.
It was during this period of reconstruction that a coal worker reportedly uttered the phrase "More necessary than the sun," reflecting the perceived indispensability of coal to Bosnia's future.
3. Economic Importance of Coal
3.1 Employment and Local Economies
Coal mining has been a significant source of employment in Bosnia, particularly in regions with few other economic opportunities.
As of 2020, the coal mining sector directly employed approximately 14,000 people, with thousands more in related industries (Energy Community Secretariat, 2021).
Data from the Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2021) shows that in some municipalities, coal-related activities account for up to 45% of formal employment. This concentration of jobs in a single industry has created a strong economic dependence on coal in these regions.
3.2 Energy Production and Security
Coal plays a dominant role in Bosnia's energy mix. According to the International Energy Agency (2021), coal accounted for 64% of the country's electricity generation in 2020. This high reliance on domestic coal resources has been viewed as crucial for energy security, reducing dependence on imported fuels.
3.3 Export Revenue
While most of Bosnia's coal production is used domestically, the country also exports coal, primarily to neighboring countries. In 2019, coal exports generated approximately 192 million BAM (about 98 million EUR) in revenue (Foreign Trade Chamber of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2020).
4. Environmental and Health Impacts
4.1 Air Pollution
The heavy reliance on coal for energy production has resulted in significant air pollution. A study by the Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL, 2019) found that coal-fired power plants in Bosnia and Herzegovina were responsible for an estimated 3,900 premature deaths between 2015 and 2019.
Data from air quality monitoring stations in coal mining regions regularly show PM2.5 and PM10 levels exceeding World Health Organization guidelines.
For instance, in Tuzla, home to the largest coal-fired power plant in the country, the annual average PM2.5 concentration in 2020 was 33.8 µg/m³, more than three times the WHO guideline value of 10 µg/m³ (Federal Hydrometeorological Institute, 2021).
4.2 Water Pollution
Coal mining and coal-fired power plants also contribute to water pollution.
A study by Greenpeace (2018) found elevated levels of heavy metals, including arsenic and lead, in water sources near coal mines and power plants in the Tuzla region.
This pollution poses risks to both human health and aquatic ecosystems.
4.3 Land Degradation
Open-pit coal mining, which accounts for a significant portion of Bosnia's coal production, has led to extensive land degradation.
According to the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations (2020), over 15,000 hectares of land have been directly impacted by surface mining operations, with only a fraction successfully reclaimed.
4.4 Health Impacts
The health impacts of coal mining and coal-fired power plants in Bosnia are significant. A study published in the European Journal of Public Health (Matković et al., 2018) found higher rates of respiratory diseases, cardiovascular problems, and certain types of cancer in communities near coal facilities compared to the national average.
Specific health statistics include:
15% higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in coal mining regions compared to the national average (Institute for Public Health FB&H, 2020)
20% increase in hospitalizations for respiratory issues during winter months in cities with coal-fired power plants (Clinic for Pulmonary Diseases, Tuzla, 2019)
Elevated blood lead levels in children living near coal mines, with 12% of tested children showing levels above WHO recommendations (University of Sarajevo Medical Faculty, 2017)
5. The Economic-Environmental Dilemma
The phrase "More necessary than the sun" encapsulates the central dilemma facing Bosnia: how to balance economic necessity with environmental and health concerns. This section explores the various facets of this dilemma.
5.1 Job Dependence and Economic Inertia
The high concentration of jobs in the coal sector in certain regions has created a form of economic lock-in. A study by the World Bank (2019) estimated that a rapid phase-out of coal could lead to the loss of up to 40,000 jobs (direct and indirect) in Bosnia, potentially devastating local economies.
This economic dependence has created strong political resistance to policies aimed at reducing coal use. Labor unions and local politicians often argue that the economic costs of moving away from coal outweigh the environmental benefits.
5.2 Energy Security Concerns
Bosnia's high reliance on coal for electricity generation raises concerns about energy security in the event of a rapid transition away from coal.
The country's power grid and energy infrastructure are primarily designed around coal-fired plants, and developing alternative sources would require significant investment and time.
5.3 Environmental Imperatives
Despite the economic challenges, the environmental case for moving away from coal is compelling.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions as part of the Paris Agreement, and its aspirations for EU membership will require alignment with EU climate policies.
The European Union's Green Deal and the increasing focus on decarbonization in international finance are likely to make continued reliance on coal economically unsustainable in the long term.
6. Future Scenarios
Given the complex interplay of economic, environmental, and social factors, this section outlines three potential scenarios for the future of coal in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Scenario 1: Business as Usual
In this scenario, Bosnia continues to rely heavily on coal for the foreseeable future, making only minimal efforts to transition to cleaner energy sources.
Potential outcomes:
Short-term economic stability in coal-dependent regions
Continued high levels of air and water pollution
Increasing isolation from international markets and financing due to climate concerns
Failure to meet international climate commitments
Potential economic crisis in the long term as coal becomes increasingly uncompetitive
Probability: Medium-Low. While there is strong domestic pressure to maintain the status quo, international factors make this scenario increasingly unlikely.
Scenario 2: Gradual Transition
This scenario envisions a managed, gradual transition away from coal over a 20-30 year period.
Potential outcomes:
Phased closure of the most polluting coal plants
Gradual increase in renewable energy capacity
Implementation of retraining programs for coal workers
Steady improvement in air and water quality
Alignment with EU environmental standards, facilitating EU accession process
Probability: High. This scenario aligns with current policy discussions and international trends.
Scenario 3: Rapid Decarbonization
In this scenario, Bosnia embraces a rapid transition away from coal, driven by a combination of domestic policy changes and international pressure.
Potential outcomes:
Significant short-term economic disruption in coal-dependent regions
Rapid improvement in environmental indicators
Potential energy supply challenges in the short term
Attraction of international investment in renewable energy projects
Positioning of Bosnia as a regional leader in clean energy
Probability: Low-Medium. While this scenario would bring the greatest environmental benefits, the economic and social challenges make it less likely in the near term.
7. Policy Implications and Recommendations
Based on the analysis of the current situation and future scenarios, this section outlines key policy recommendations for addressing the coal dilemma in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
7.1 Develop a Comprehensive Just Transition Strategy
Establish a national task force to develop a detailed plan for transitioning away from coal
Ensure representation from affected communities, labor unions, environmental groups, and industry in the planning process
Set clear timelines and targets for coal phase-out, aligned with international climate commitments
7.2 Invest in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency
Increase government support for renewable energy projects, particularly wind and solar
Implement energy efficiency programs to reduce overall energy demand
Modernize the power grid to better accommodate renewable energy sources
7.3 Support Economic Diversification in Coal-Dependent Regions
Develop targeted economic development plans for coal-dependent regions
Provide incentives for businesses to locate in these areas
Invest in education and training programs to prepare workers for jobs in new industries
7.4 Strengthen Environmental Regulations and Enforcement
Align air and water quality standards with EU norms
Increase funding and capacity for environmental monitoring and enforcement
Implement stricter regulations on coal mine reclamation
7.5 Enhance Regional Cooperation
Collaborate with neighboring countries on renewable energy projects and grid integration
Participate actively in regional and EU-level discussions on energy transition
7.6 Improve Public Health Monitoring and Interventions
Establish a comprehensive health monitoring system in coal-affected regions
Develop targeted public health interventions to address the health impacts of coal pollution
8. Conclusion
The phrase "More necessary than the sun," uttered by a Bosnian coal worker in the 1990s, continues to resonate as Bosnia and Herzegovina grapples with the complex legacy of its coal industry.
This study has highlighted the deep economic dependence on coal, the severe environmental and health costs associated with its use, and the challenges of transitioning to a more sustainable energy future.
The data presented in this paper underscores the urgent need for action.
The health impacts of coal pollution, the long-term economic risks of continued coal dependence, and the global imperative to address climate change all point towards the necessity of a managed transition away from coal.
However, this transition must be handled carefully, with due consideration for the economic and social impacts on coal-dependent communities.
The future scenarios outlined in this paper illustrate both the risks of inaction and the potential pathways for a just and sustainable energy transition.
As Bosnia and Herzegovina looks to the future, the challenge will be to redefine its relationship with coal – to move from a paradigm where coal is seen as "more necessary than the sun" to one where clean air, good health, and sustainable economic development are recognized as truly indispensable.
This transition, while daunting, offers an opportunity for Bosnia to build a more resilient, healthy, and prosperous future for all its citizens.
コメント